<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Phytochemicals and enzymes inhibitory potentials of leaves and rootbarks of Sarcocephallus latifolius (smith): In vitro and in silico investigations

Abstract

In this study, bioactive compounds were isolated and characterized from the leaves and root-barks extracts of S. latifolius, with subsequent in vitro experimental investigations for antihyperglycemic potentials on α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes. Thirteen bioactive compounds were identified, including 10-Hydroxystrictosamide (2) and Quinovic acid-3-O-α-L-rhamnosyl-28-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl ester (8), using chromatographic, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), and mass spectrometry (MS) techniques. Experimental assays revealed that compounds 1–4 exhibited potent inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase, with compound 2 demonstrating the most potent α-amylase inhibition (IC50 value of 0.52 ± 0.003 μg/mL). Compound 8 showed a lower IC50 value (0.098 ± 0.016 μg/mL) against α-glucosidase compared to compound 2 and acarbose. Synergistic effects among the compounds could enhance their inhibitory actions on the enzymes, positioning them as potential antihyperglycemia agents. Compound 2 displayed the highest binding affinity (􀀀 7.970 kcal/mol) when docked against α-amylase (PDB ID: 2QV4), comparable to acarbose (􀀀 8.515 kcal/mol). It also ranked among the top ligands against α-glucosidase (PDB ID 3TOP), although compound 13 and acarbose had higher docking scores. All compounds exhibited ideal ADMET properties, suggesting good bioavailability and low toxicity. In conclusion, the isolated compounds exhibit promising antihyperglycemic potential and favourable safety profiles for further exploration.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Ajiboye A. T., Asekun O. T., Ayipo Y. O., Mordi M. N., Familoni O. B., Ali Z., Khan I. A.: Phytochemicals and enzymes inhibitory potentials of leaves and rootbarks of Sarcocephallus latifolius (smith): In vitro and in silico investigations. Fitoterapia, 176 (2024) 106037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2024.106037

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By